Sunday, July 23, 2017

The case of the deathbed promise shows that

Deathbed visions have been defined because of the reality historic instances, but the first systematic have a look at turned into not performed till the twentieth century.[7] they have got moreover been called veridical hallucinations, visions of the loss of life and predeath visions.[1] The health practitioner William Barrett, creator of the ebook loss of life-bed Visions (1926), accrued anecdotes of folks who had claimed to have professional visions of deceased friends and partner and children, the sound of music and distinctive deathbed phenomena.[8] Barrett turn out to be a Christian spiritualist and believed the visions were proof for spirit communication.[9]

In a look at performed among 1959 and 1973 with the aid of the parapsychologists Karlis Osis and Erlendur Haraldsson, they suggested that 50% of the tens of lots of people they studied within the u.s. and India had skilled deathbed visions.[7] Osis and Haraldsson and other parapsychologists collectively with Raymond Moody have interpreted the reports as evidence for an afterlife.[10][11]

The neurologist Terence Hines has written that the proponents of the afterlife interpretation grossly underestimate the range the various reports. Hines additionally criticized their method of amassing the reports:

    The way in which the reviews are amassed poses a few different excessive problem for individuals who need to take them severely as proof of an afterlife. Osis and Haraldsson’s (1977) have a study emerge as based mostly on replies obtained from 10000 questionnaires despatched to docs and nurses inside the the us and India. high-quality 6.four percentage have been decrease back. since it changed into the medical doctors and nurses who've been giving the reports, now not the sufferers who had, probable, without a doubt had the experience, the reviews had been secondhand. this means they had passed thru  specifically fallible and wonderful human memory systems (the health practitioner’s or nurse’s and the actual patient’s) before achieving Osis and Haraldsson. In special times (i.e., Moody 1977) the reviews have been given thru the patients themselves, months and years after the event. Such reviews are occasionally sufficient to argue for the reality of an afterlife.[6]
Disqus Comments